All posts in Uncategorized

Microsoft’s SkyDrive – Not Safe For Work

With Microsoft Corp.’s aggressive strategy to build out its Software-as-a-Service capability to online storage—even as physical, hardware-based storage remains ubiquitous and competitive—some businesses may find it tempting to allow employees and workgroups to jump into Microsoft’s SkyDrive for some limited purpose.

SkyDrive, Microsoft’s Office Live storage arm, is a free, Web-based service that is loosely integrated with some Office applications and, because of how it’s organized, outflanks its biggest rival, Google Inc., in online storage. The Test Center has taken a look at SkyDrive, formally launched last month after a short beta run, in the ever-expanding shadow of high-powered NAS, SAN and desktop storage solutions.

Full Article – http://www.crn.com/storage/206905860?cid=customFeed

Photoshop Express Online

You shot it — now do something to it. Make it pop. Make it impossible to ignore. Upload, sort, polish, and store up to 2GB of photos. All for free. Resize, tint, distort, and more — add your mark to all your images. Then show them off on Adobe® Photoshop® Express or your Facebook page.

Adobe has released a beta version of its online Photoshop program.

link – http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopexpress/?promoid=CBTVM

Microsoft Remote Server Administration Tools for Windows Vista SP1 32-bit Edition (KB941314)

Microsoft Remote Server Administration Tools (RSAT) enables IT administrators to remotely manage roles and features in Windows Server 2008 from a computer running Windows Vista with SP1. It includes support for remote management of computers running either a Server Core installation or the full installation option of Windows Server 2008. It provides similar functionality to Windows Server 2003 Administration Tools Pack.

Download Link – http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9ff6e897-23ce-4a36-b7fc-d52065de9960&DisplayLang=en

Availability of the Windows Vista Service Pack 1 management tools for the Hyper-V release candidate

The Windows Vista Service Pack 1 management tools for the Hyper-V release candidate are now available. This update package installs the Hyper-V remote management tools on a computer that is running Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1). This package includes the following:

• The Hyper-V Manager. The Hyper-V Manager is a Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in that provides management access to a Windows Server 2008-based server that uses the Hyper-V role.

• The Virtual Machine Connection. The Virtual Machine Connection is a remote connection tool that you can use to establish an interactive session on a virtual machine

Link – http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=949758

Ultimate Extras: What happened to GroupShot

It’s no secret that those futuristic demos at the Consumer Electronics Show each year don’t always turn into real, live products. But when Microsoft showed a working version of the “GroupShot” photo-editing tool at CES last year, there seemed little doubt that it would be released as promised as part of the Windows Vista Ultimate Extras program.

That’s not how it turned out. More than a year later, GroupShot hasn’t yet been released as an Ultimate Extra. As explained in this story in today’s newspaper, that’s one of the ways that the Ultimate Extras initiative has fallen short of original expectations. But what happened to GroupShot, in particular? I asked Microsoft’s Barry Goffe that question when I spoke with him for the story.

“The thing that we showed at CES was real, live code … but it wasn’t really up to snuff, it wasn’t something that I would have felt good about shipping to millions of customers,” Goffe said. The company had to make “some tough choices, and one of the choices was we’re not going to ship that one right away — it was too much work to get it out.” He said the company may still decide to ship it as an Ultimate Extra in the future.

A version of GroupShot, from Microsoft Research, is available for download on this site. [See correction below.] It takes similar photos and assembles them into a composite image that reflects the best qualities of each.

See today’s story for more on the Ultimate Extras initiative.

Correction: As noted by reader “Kubla Kant” below, the program is actually no longer available for download. The download link on the GroupShot page leads to a page that says the beta period has expired, although they’re “currently considering several options” to bring it back.

Full Article – http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/134952.asp?source=rss

Microsoft delivers yet another updated XP SP3 RC 2 test build

A day after I threw in my XP SP3 date-projection towel, Microsoft has released yet another new, public test build of its forthcoming collection of fixes and patches for Windows XP.

A company spokeswoman e-mailed the following update on March 25:

“Windows XP SP3 RC2 Refresh was made publicly available today via Microsoft Download Center. We’ve made this release candidate available in order to receive further user feedback prior to the release of Windows XP SP3.”

(Note: I don’t see the new RC2 refresh on Download Center yet. I guess it is on its way….)

It turns out this new refresh is not entirely “new.” Via the TechNet forums:

“The purpose of RC2 Refresh is to validate improvements to the Windows Update experience with Service Pack 3. Therefore, this beta release will be available only on Windows Update, in English, German and Japanese. Beyond fixes for common Windows Update issues and the inclusion of support for HD Audio, there are no substantial differences between this beta release (build 5508) and XP SP3 RC2 (build 3311).”

Microsoft released the first of is RC2 builds in early February. Instead of calling the newest test build RC 3 (or 4 or whatever number we are really up to now), Microsoft is calling the build released Tuesday RC 2 Refresh.

And when is that elusive final XP SP3 release? No update there. Microsoft is still saying first half of 2008. Some sites are projecting that by mid- to late-April, Microsoft will deliver the final build.

Article – Zdnet

What you need to know about Microsoft's proposed takeover of Yahoo

Does a Microsoft-Yahoo deal make sense? Probably. As separate companies, Microsoft and Yahoo duplicate systems and staff. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said a merger could save $1 billion annually. According to industry observers, the time is right because Yahoo’s stock is down, and the company hasn’t improved its results even after co-founder Jerry Yang took over as CEO in the middle of last year. Plus, Microsoft’s offer, initially 62% over Yahoo’s share price, is a very good deal for Yahoo shareholders.

Full Article – http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9071478

What you need to know about Microsoft’s proposed takeover of Yahoo

Does a Microsoft-Yahoo deal make sense? Probably. As separate companies, Microsoft and Yahoo duplicate systems and staff. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said a merger could save $1 billion annually. According to industry observers, the time is right because Yahoo’s stock is down, and the company hasn’t improved its results even after co-founder Jerry Yang took over as CEO in the middle of last year. Plus, Microsoft’s offer, initially 62% over Yahoo’s share price, is a very good deal for Yahoo shareholders.

Full Article – http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9071478

Review: Using Windows Server 2008 on a PC

Sometimes, deciding which IT course to follow can feel like a U.S. presidential election cycle: You never have more than two options, and neither one seems quite right. You find yourself wishing there was a viable third-party candidate, if only to keep the two front-runners on their toes.

Fortunately, in the case of Windows XP versus Vista, a third way has indeed emerged. Thanks to the musings of a (hopefully still employed) Microsoft engineer, some disaffected Vista users have discovered that Windows Server 2008, properly configured and tweaked to be more Vista-like, makes a killer workstation OS. In fact, recent benchmark testing shows that Server 2008 runs circles around Vista (up to 17 percent faster) at a variety of business productivity and client/server computing tasks.

Full Article – http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9070658&source=rss_topic125

IIS 7 Mobile Admin

IIS 7 Mobile Admin lets you remotely administer a IIS 7 Web server right from your mobile phone. I do like the fact that this is a web application and not a smart/thick client running natively on the phone. Nothing stops you from even borrowing your friend’s iPhone (I assume you use a Windows Mobile 🙂 – feedback on how it looks on an iPhone or any other phone to sukesh) and go about administering your web site from anywhere.

Read more on Sukesh’s blog at http://www.awesomeideas.net/page/IIS7-Mobile-Admin.aspx

Sukesh has also shared the source code on Codeplex, if there is a feature you’d like to contribute towards, you can find the project at http://www.codeplex.com/IIS7MobileAdmin/

What’s the difference between the COM and EXE extensions?

Commenter Koro asks why you can rename a COM file to EXE without any apparent ill effects. (James MAstros asked a similar question, though there are additional issues in James’ question which I will take up at a later date.)

Initially, the only programs that existed were COM files. The format of a COM file is… um, none. There is no format. A COM file is just a memory image. This “format” was inherited from CP/M. To load a COM file, the program loader merely sucked the file into memory unchanged and then jumped to the first byte. No fixups, no checksum, nothing. Just load and go.

The COM file format had many problems, among which was that programs could not be bigger than about 64KB. To address these limitations, the EXE file format was introduced. The header of an EXE file begins with the magic letters “MZ” and continues with other information that the program loader uses to load the program into memory and prepare it for execution.

And there things lay, with COM files being “raw memory images” and EXE files being “structured”, and the distinction was rigidly maintained. If you renamed an EXE file to COM, the operating system would try to execute the header as if it were machine code (which didn’t get you very far), and conversely if you renamed a COM file to EXE, the program loader would reject it because the magic MZ header was missing.

So when did the program loader change to ignore the extension entirely and just use the presence or absence of an MZ header to determine what type of program it is? Compatibility, of course.

Over time, programs like FORMAT.COM, EDIT.COM, and even COMMAND.COM grew larger than about 64KB. Under the original rules, that meant that the extension had to be changed to EXE, but doing so introduced a compatibility problem. After all, since the files had been COM files up until then, programs or batch files that wanted to, say, spawn a command interpreter, would try to execute COMMAND.COM. If the command interpreter were renamed to COMMAND.EXE, these programs which hard-coded the program name would stop working since there was no COMMAND.COM any more.

Making the program loader more flexible meant that these “well-known programs” could retain their COM extension while no longer being constrained by the “It all must fit into 64KB” limitation of COM files.

But wait, what if a COM program just happened to begin with the letters MZ? Fortunately, that never happened, because the machine code for “MZ” disassembles as follows:

0100 4D            DEC     BP
0101 5A            POP     DX

The first instruction decrements a register whose initial value is undefined, and the second instruction underflows the stack. No sane program would begin with two undefined operations.

Full Article – http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/03/24/8332730.aspx

What's the difference between the COM and EXE extensions?

Commenter Koro asks why you can rename a COM file to EXE without any apparent ill effects. (James MAstros asked a similar question, though there are additional issues in James’ question which I will take up at a later date.)

Initially, the only programs that existed were COM files. The format of a COM file is… um, none. There is no format. A COM file is just a memory image. This “format” was inherited from CP/M. To load a COM file, the program loader merely sucked the file into memory unchanged and then jumped to the first byte. No fixups, no checksum, nothing. Just load and go.

The COM file format had many problems, among which was that programs could not be bigger than about 64KB. To address these limitations, the EXE file format was introduced. The header of an EXE file begins with the magic letters “MZ” and continues with other information that the program loader uses to load the program into memory and prepare it for execution.

And there things lay, with COM files being “raw memory images” and EXE files being “structured”, and the distinction was rigidly maintained. If you renamed an EXE file to COM, the operating system would try to execute the header as if it were machine code (which didn’t get you very far), and conversely if you renamed a COM file to EXE, the program loader would reject it because the magic MZ header was missing.

So when did the program loader change to ignore the extension entirely and just use the presence or absence of an MZ header to determine what type of program it is? Compatibility, of course.

Over time, programs like FORMAT.COM, EDIT.COM, and even COMMAND.COM grew larger than about 64KB. Under the original rules, that meant that the extension had to be changed to EXE, but doing so introduced a compatibility problem. After all, since the files had been COM files up until then, programs or batch files that wanted to, say, spawn a command interpreter, would try to execute COMMAND.COM. If the command interpreter were renamed to COMMAND.EXE, these programs which hard-coded the program name would stop working since there was no COMMAND.COM any more.

Making the program loader more flexible meant that these “well-known programs” could retain their COM extension while no longer being constrained by the “It all must fit into 64KB” limitation of COM files.

But wait, what if a COM program just happened to begin with the letters MZ? Fortunately, that never happened, because the machine code for “MZ” disassembles as follows:

0100 4D            DEC     BP
0101 5A            POP     DX

The first instruction decrements a register whose initial value is undefined, and the second instruction underflows the stack. No sane program would begin with two undefined operations.

Full Article – http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/03/24/8332730.aspx

Policy-Driven Network Access with Windows Server 2008

Windows administrators are smack-dab in the middle of a challenging security balancing act: how to enable easy access to resources while still meeting ever-increasing information and network security requirements. As this feature describes, a great way to help strike the appropriate balance between access and security is to shift from traditional connectivity models to one that seeks to define network access in a more logical and policy-centric fashion.

Full Article – http://blogs.technet.com/tnmag/archive/2008/03/25/policy-driven-network-access-with-windows-server-2008.aspx

Visual Studio 2008 Product Comparison Guide

This guide provides a comprehensive product comparison of the Visual Studio 2008 IDE products. It does not provide data about Visual Studio Team System 2008 Team Foundation Server, Visual Studio Team System 2008 Team Explorer, or Visual Studio Team System 2008 Test Load Agent. This guide is provided for illustrative purposes only.

link – http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=727bcfb0-b575-47ab-9fd8-4ee067bb3a37&DisplayLang=en

Firefox 3 “will launch in June”

Mozilla has confirmed that Firefox 3 will launch in June, although the organisation is urging users to switch to the new browser already.

Until now, Mozilla has discouraged average internet users from moving on from Firefox 2, which was launched in October 2006. But Mozilla Corp vice president of engineering, Mike Schroepfer, says the beta four version of the software is ready for the general public. “In many ways it (Firefox 3) is much more stable than anything else out there,” he claims.

Full Article – http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/180777/firefox-3-will-launch-in-june.html